Subscription data normally sits at the heart of a publisher’s view of the customer, because it’s crucial to know who has paid for what. But, the same rules don’t apply to Open Access (OA) journals, whereby content is made available for free and a publisher’s revenue stream comes instead from an ‘author pays’ model. Let’s take a look at the various ways an OA model might change your marketing activities:
1. The Author is King. In a model where authors pay you for your peer review, content production and distribution services, accurate author data displaces subscription information as the most critical information source. You might already be analysing data from your manuscript tracking system, but does it include details relating to each author’s submission history and publishing outcomes, author interests, and also editor activity? You’ll want to ensure that every drop of author information is available to your staff for searching, segmentation and analysis.
2. Follow the Money. Who is paying you to publish OA content? It might be the authors themselves, or more likely their research funders. These could be academic institutions or other organisations already known to you as paying subscribers, but it’s possible there could be gaps in your knowledge here and further research to capture the details of all potential funders might be necessary. Of course, wherever possible, you will also need to know the connections too, ie. which authors are related to which funders?
3. Who’s Who? With author and funder records taking centre stage, the need for standard names and common identifiers becomes critical. An author’s name is a poor basis for identification because there are so many different authors who share the same name. The ORCID initiative which is aiming to solve the author/contributor name ambiguity problem in scholarly communications, is very relevant here, and it’s likely that this ID will soon become a must-have field in every author or manuscript database.
4. Article Usage. Usage is another data source that you may already be including in your single view, but your statistics are probably only at the journal level and integrated from an institutional perspective. Clearly, high institutional usage remains important to satisfying existing authors, attracting new authors and enhancing your brand overall, but you will now need to provide authors with statistics on the performance of their individual articles. The PLoS article-level metrics are interesting food for thought here. Your single view should therefore be capable of segmenting on usage at the article level too. In this context, the PIRUS projects and a new COUNTER standard for journal article usage are also very relevant.
5. Data Mining. You will want to include and explore any data source that might lead you to new authors, as ‘prospecting for new authors’ replaces ‘prospecting for new subscribers’ as a key sales and marketing priority. This might draw on data sources already at hand (eg. alert recipients, society member records) but it could also be sources not yet on your radar, such as conference proceedings or third party resources listing authors and their past papers or interests.
In summary: it’s clear that OA publishing can turn a lot of current journal marketing practice on its head. Any publisher involved in OA publishing should therefore give careful consideration to all of the issues highlighted here, and consider taking steps to ensure that all the relevant data is being captured and made available for author-based analysis.
I know the subject of ‘turnaways’ doesn’t sound very festive, but there is a tenuous link: Mary and Joseph became very early turnaway statistics themselves when they were told there was “no room at the inn”.
Lists appear everywhere on the web: most commonly as bulleted or numbered text and within dropdown form fields. This comes as no surprise, because lists are a great way of helping users make sense of complex information. However, as with many things that seem simple at first glance, they can pose their own set of tricky challenges once you look beneath the surface.
Many of the companies we deal with personally provide astoundingly bad customer service (phone, mobile and utility companies: we’re looking at you). Well, they say if a job’s worth doing badly, it’s worth doing really badly – so here are 5 top tips for companies who truly wish to excel at bad customer service.
An integrated, single customer view has many benefits but it can often pose a tricky question too if your various data sources harbour different opt-in/opt-out contact permissions for the same individuals: can I talk to you or not? It’s important to address this problem, to ensure you are communicating with as many relevant people as possible, while also respecting the wishes of those who prefer not to receive marketing messages. Here’s how we have worked with some of our clients to address this challenge:
This month sees DataSalon’s 5th birthday and the anniversary of our first client (Oxford University Press) signing up for our customer insight solution MasterVision. Like any startup we’ve definitely had our ups and downs, but 5 years down the line we’re still here, and so it seems like a good time to share some insights into what works well for us:
This month sees the release of
Website owners spend a lot of time and effort debating and designing navigation menus for their sites, but for users, the most frequently used navigation aid is likely to be their browser’s ‘Back’ button. Consistently placed, and almost always available, it can be trusted to return them to their previous page whenever they suspect they are heading the wrong way.
When selling or marketing subscription journals, you need at the very least to have a firm grasp of who is and isn’t already getting access to your content. Your approach will clearly be different for existing customers than it is for new prospects. However, the complexities of scholarly publishing mean this is often a lot more complicated than it sounds:
Effective testing is key to the success of any IT project, but can be difficult to get right. When not done well, it is a source of frustration for project managers, business users, and developers alike. This month’s feature suggests five tips for removing unwanted stress from the testing process.